Greenfield project is viewed of having less technical complexity compared to brownfield one. In gas development project, greenfield is yet heavily influenced by other complexities such as hydrocarbon evacuation and commercial arrangement. Unlike oil projects, a gas project would never be sanctioned if there is no clarity in the arrangement of sales and its commerciality.
Furthermore, for certain projects
which have limited economics, the development concept will play a significant
role in determining project feasibility. Some scenarios of cost deployment may
be involved such as staging development and buy or rent option. The keys are to
optimize project schedule and project cost to meet the minimum economic
threshold.
Technology selection will also be
critical to optimize the first-gas timeline and its cost. In addition, modular
facilities have been matured up in recent years, so that project schedule can
be compressed to accelerate the production. It is also expected that cost
optimization can be further exercised to support the project economics
particularly for marginal development project.
This paper discusses the modularity
approach during the planning stage has changed the development strategy and project
cost. It is a greenfield development with limited volume of hydrocarbon in
typical PSC terms applied in Indonesia. In addition, the possible
implementation of CCS program will add burden in the economics that potentially
sets project as marginal development.
Find out detail at: Jurnal IAFMI Edition-16 published December 2024